14 MPs turn up to discuss UN report on 14 million people living in poverty

The UN’s report on poverty in Britain is at risk of being swept under the carpet after just 14 MPs turned up to debate the issue in parliament yesterday.

A festive hangover appeared to have swept over the House of Commons as politicians returned from their holiday break.

Only a handful of MPs bothered to turn up to an adjournment debate on the findings of the United Nations Report on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights in the UK and Northern Ireland, with new Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd sending a junior minister in her place instead.

Although such debates are rarely well attended the Labour MPs who turned up lamented the government for the disdain it had shown towards the report, with Liz McInnes saying the United States Government showed a similar lack of interest when the UN highlighted issues in regards to poverty in the country.

“I know that we have a special relationship with the United States, but I think it shames us all that we share that disdain,” she said.

Following his visit in November, United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur, Professor Philip Alston gave a scathing report on the level of poverty in the UK, saying it risks causing damage to “the fabric of British society”.

He said the UK Government’s policies are entrenching high levels of poverty and inflicting unnecessary misery in one of the richest countries in the world, but warned that amid the country’s impending exit from the European Union the government appears to be treating it as an afterthought.

Yesterday his grim predictions seemed to have come true.

Labour’s Shadow Minister for Children, Emma Lewell-Buck hosted the debate on the UN report which was pushed back late into the evening.

With 14 million people living in poverty in the UK there was just one MP for every one million people who are suffering at the hands of the government, with the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions both absent and both previously “dismissing” the findings of the report.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd Prime Minister Theresa May

Conservative MP Justin Tomlinson assured parliament that the Tories will “consider the report seriously”, but added that they “obviously do not agree with all the points”. He added that his department will “keep on working with all stakeholders and partnership organisations to ensure that those in most need in society receive the support that they should”, saying they are “also looking at homelessness” too.

But his assurances fell short of the mark for the MPs in attendance.

DUP MP Jim Shannon said: “My constituency office is about 100 yards from the social security office—it is as close as that—and I have had numerous distressed people come from the social security office to my office looking for advice.

“I have written perhaps not to the Minister directly but to his Department to outline some of the changes that we feel should be made. In the light of those things, perhaps more needs to be done in the social security office to address the issues early on.”

And Labour MP Thelma Walker added: “As a former headteacher, I talk to a lot of my former colleagues. Many of them, of a morning, are washing children’s clothes and giving them breakfast.

“They are having to give children extra lunch because they are starving. Does the Minister agree that that is totally unnecessary and inappropriate? We should be caring for the most vulnerable in our society.”

The House was adjourned at 10.40pm.

Since you’re here …

Real, independent, investigative journalism is in alarming decline. It costs a lot to produce. Many publications facing an uncertain future can no longer afford to fund it. This means journalists are losing the ability to hold the rich and powerful to account.

We do not charge or put articles behind a paywall. If you can, please show your appreciation for our free content by donating whatever you think is fair to help keep TLE growing.

Every penny we collect from donations supports vital investigative and independent journalism. You can also help us grow by inviting your friends to follow us on social media.

Donate Now Button

Related Posts

Philip Alston accuses Amber Rudd of trying to “distract” from troubling human rights findings
Boris Johnson
Boris Johnson could be prosecuted for misconduct in public office over lies Britain gives £350m to the EU per week.
Will the ‘Special Relationship’ bring Britain into Trump’s war on Iran?

16 Responses

  1. Sandra Bennett

    Interesting as it is,surely it would have more effect if you identified by name and party the decent ones who bothered to attend?

    1. Sibrydionmawr

      Absolutely! Unless we know who exactly attended we cannot genuinely take part in democracy. If we knew who did attend, and who didn’t we could let our elected representatives know our displeasure at their no attendance, or alternatively congratulate them on their attendance and any positive contributions they made – thus ruling out any Tories present!

      It is a disgrace when so few Labour MPs turn up for an event that should be at the centre of their concerns. Seemingly they care as much about the poor, the sick, the disabled and the unemployed as they do about those of us who wish to remain in the EU.

      Some hope of a Labour government next time, they’re as effing useless as the Tories are obnoxious.

      1. Rachel

        Technically that is true, but this final “adjournment debate” is an opportunity for an MP to raise and issue, by asking the appropriate minister a question about it. The MP cannot then reply to the minister, but other MPs can. As it is the last item of the day and it has limited scope, that may be a reason few were there. But the topic deserves a main debate.

  2. Lizzie Walker

    For those of us who need to know, Hansard lists those speaking (in the order they spoke) as:

    Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck (South Shields) (Lab) (holding the debate)
    Liz McInnes (Heywood and Middleton) (Lab)
    Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP)
    Thelma Walker (Colne Valley) (Lab)
    Hugh Gaffney (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) (Lab)
    Deidre Brock (Edinburgh North and Leith) (SNP)
    Ruth George (High Peak) (Lab)
    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Justin Tomlinson)

    Not sure who the other 6 were – Hansard doesn’t list those who did not speak. The matter was discussed from 10.11pm to 10.40pm.

  3. brett rigby

    Disgusting! think its time the public had more say in who sits in those seats and who doesn’t! sick to fucking death of politicians turning up and sat there ASLEEP? i’m sorry but in any job in the world sleeping on the job is a sackable offense; you can bet your ass bums would be in those seats if they know failure to show up would result in them losing a job! half arsed politics and it needs to stop

  4. Jacque Chate'

    All are now only in it as Career Politician – The plain truth is that politicians today are not driven by a love and/or better welfare of (UK or any) humanity and the constantly thought about how they might help people to have a better easier life. They only have one goal. An egoistic self-seeking wealth for themselves and screw Mr & Mrs General Public for as much as they can.

  5. Jacque Chate

    Today they are all Career Politician – The plain truth is that politicians today are not driven by a love and/or better welfare of (UK or any) humanity and the constantly thought about how they might help people to have a better easier life. They only have one goal. An egoistic self-seeking wealth for themselves and screw Mr & Mrs General Public for as much as they can.

  6. jane Kane

    The replies above are typical of this really annoying trend of thinking they are all the same You cannot comment until you know the facts. This kind of article is so vague and is trying to tar them all with the same brush Maybe the missing MPs were out working for their constituents. The Labour government under Corbyn has done little else other than fight for the poorest in society. The two parties are polar opposites and can’t be compared. Blame the tories but not left wing Labour, it is grossly unfair after one article .

    1. Stefan Barnes

      Were would they be out working for their constituents?, down a night club it was 10 pm?did you even read the article?.Left wing ,right wing they all belong to the same bird

  7. Allen Vincent

    Can’t believe I missed this shocker! 1689 Bill of Rights and Magna Carta were never repealable or amendable to the detriment of the people for the betterment of State. Meaning, not only have you ALWAYS had the natural right to kill members of state, you’ve had the NATURAL right to fully automatic weapons to do so! The death penalty for members of state that includes all public authorities, police, judges, magistrates, court staff, NHS, Councils, Social Services and the like NEVER ceased! “Pretended laws” aka modern day “fake laws” my fellow warriors.

Leave a Reply