Cauliflower steak

Cauliflower Steak: Putting the debate on meat imitations to bed

Earlier this week, Marks & Spencer were the subject of social media outrage following the launch of a “Cauliflower Steak” as part of their new “veggie” range. A thick slice of cauliflower was presented as a “steak”, joined by a sachet of “lemon and herb drizzle” and sealed within an abundance of unnecessary plastic packaging. Priced at £2, the notion of an M&S “Cauliflower Steak” seemed eye-wateringly expensive, considering a whole cauliflower from the same shop costs just £1 – or even less from any rational, non-exploitative greengrocer.

Since then, the supermarket and high street department store has chosen to pull the controversial cauliflower steak from their range, following such outrage. On the decision to stop selling the cauliflower steak, an M&S spokesperson said: “Once we’ve sold the stock that is currently in stores, we won’t be ordering any more of this product. We work hard to create quick and convenient meals for customers; however, on this occasion we didn’t get it right. We have launched many other vegetarian dishes that are already proving popular with customers.”

The concept of slicing a cauliflower through the middle and masquerading it as a ‘cauliflower steak’ isn’t just ridiculous; it’s an insult, it’s condescending to vegetarians, it’s wasteful, it’s arguably absurd. Cauliflower is a excellent meat substitute, but does it really need to be likened to meat? Some have used social media networks (namely Twitter) to argue in favour of the cauliflower steak’s convenience. But let’s be realistic, is anybody really too lazy to slice the ends off of the vegetable?

Then there’s the matter of taste. Cauliflower is a vegetable that’s brilliantly bland, thus taking especially well to spice, as is demonstrated so appealingly in so many London restaurants. Berber & Q’s cauliflower shawarma, rubbed with a North African-inspired spice mix, grilled then topped with tahini, pomegranate seeds and pine nuts is a particularly popular example of cauliflower in all of its glory. This, alongside so many other restaurant dishes, gives weight to the argument that meat alternatives needn’t be likened to meat.

On the subject of M&S’ cauliflower steak, I spoke to a devoted vegan about her personal opinion. Is the whole concept condescending to vegans, or a welcome ‘grab and go’ vegan meal? @Francesthevegan (on Twitter and Instagram) said: “Majority of the time vegetarians or vegans choosing to use terms such a ‘cauliflower steak’ to describe a dish is merely out of convenience and to make it more relatable. The alternative is to try and describe the meal in a way that people understand but using alternative terms which can simply just be a nuisance aka ‘flat piece of cauliflower fried in oil and spices’ etc. Everyone understands the concept of a ‘steak’ due to it being a popular meat dish and therefore using it to describe a vegetarian or vegan dish can help to create a better image of how that dish might appear on their plate. Trust me, no one is claiming that a cauliflower steak replicates the taste of a meat steak or a fruit pizza actually tastes like pizza.”

Cauliflower is natural and wholly meat-free, so surely it should be celebrated as such? But, more to the point; I’m sure we can all agree it’s completely obscene to charge £2 for a thick slice of cauliflower, ensnared by unnecessary plastic packaging? Won’t somebody please think of the polar bears.

RELATED

Related Posts

It's time for Britain to stand up to Saudi Arabia
The E320 train
A “wine line” train linking London and Bordeaux could soon be a thing
SWNS Pictures of the Year 2015 - One hundred of the most compelling images on the SWNS wire this year as chosen by our picture editors. Refugees from Syria leave Glasgow Airport in five coaches in heavy rain, November 17, 2015, from where they will be dispersed to their new homes within Scotland. See SWNS story SWREFUGEE: The first charter flight carrying Syrian refugees arrived in the UK yesterday (Tues) as part of the Government's resettlement scheme. Around 100 people were transported by plane from refugee camps in the Middle East, travelling from Beirut in Lebanon to Glasgow Airport. Many have been described as vulnerable and some had stayed in camps for up to four years. Landing in Glasgow at 3.30pm yesterday afternoon, the first arrivals were expected to be resettled by local authorities across the country, including Glasgow and Edinburgh.
Lift The Ban petition reveals staggering cost to UK economy of asylum seekers being banned from working

Leave a Reply